Tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with dry eye syndrome

Keywords: quality of life, dry eye syndrome, questionnaire


The negative influence of the dry eye syndrome on the quality of patients’ life is primarily determined by a decrease in visual performance. Quality of life in dry eye syndrome is a complex, multicomponent phenomenon that is influenced by a number of factors. The timely prescription of properly selected substitution therapy medications will help to improve the patients’ quality of life, which is one of the criteria of human health.

Purpose – development of a questionnaire to analyze the quality of life of patients with dry eye syndrome.

Methods of generalization, system-review and comparative analysis were used.

While analyzing the existing questionnaires, whose main purpose is to assess the condition of patients with dry eye syndrome, we evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of certain questionnaires when it comes to determining the effectiveness of the prescribed therapy using the «quality of life» integrated indicator as well as instrumental research methods. A questionnaire was developed, which allows to identify the relationship between objective instrumental data, the influence of environmental factors, the severity of the dry eye syndrome symptoms, impact on daily activities and social life of the patients.

The existing questionnaires that aim to determine the severity of symptoms of the dry eye syndrome are an indirect tool for assessing the quality of life, but do not allow to take into account the impact of dry eye syndrome on various areas of a patient's life. The created questionnaire makes it possible to take into account and conduct the dynamic analysis of not only the subjective feelings of the patient, but also to compare them with indicators describing the condition of tear film layers, which had been obtained as a result of an instrumental method of diagnostics using Lacrygiag. In addition, this weekly diary allows to determine the benefits of individualized pathogenically substantiated choice of substitution therapy medications for the treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome. Significant attention is paid to the presence of concomitant pathologies, as well as selected pharmacotherapy methods, as they significantly affect the course and outcome of substitution therapy for dry eye syndrome.


Syndrom sukhoho oka. Klinichna nastanova, zasnovana na dokazakh. 2019. URL:

Craig J. P., Nichols K. K., Akpek E. K. et al. TFOS DEWS II definition and classification report // Ocul. Surf. – 2017. – V. 15. – P. 276–283.

Jones L., Downie L. E., Korb D. et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report // Ocul. Surf. – 2017. – V. 15. – P. 575–628.

Soloviov S. O., Dziublyk I. V., Trokhymchuk V. V. Kontseptualni osnovy farmakoekonomichnoho analizu tekhnolohii profilaktyky khronichnykh virusnykh infektsii // Farmats. zhurn. – 2019. – T. 74, № 5. – S. 35‒43.

Willcox M. D. P., Argüeso P., Georgiev G. et al. TFOS DEWS II tear film report // Ocul. Surf. – 2017. – V. 15. – P. 366–403.

Stapleton F., Alves M., Bunya V. Y. et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report // Ocul. Surf. – 2017. – V. 15. – P. 334–65.

Wolffsohn J. S., Arita R., Chalmers R. et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report // Ocul. Surf. – 2017. – V. 15. – P. 539–74.

Tomashevska Yu. O., Kryvoviaz O. V. Farmakobezpeka zastosuvannia likarskykh preparativ u patsiientiv iz syndromom sukhoho oka, a takozh tykh, yaki maiut ryzyk yoho vynyknennia // Farmats. zhurn. – 2020. – T. 75, № 4. – S. 94–103.

Sakane Y., Yamaguchi M., Yokoi N. et al. Development and Validation of the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score Questionnaire // JAMA Ophthalmol. – 2013. – V. 131, N 10. – P. 1331–1338.

Lu F., Tao A., Hu Y. et al. Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Three Common Dry Eye Questionnaires in Chinese // J. Ophthalmol. – 2018. – V. 4. – P. 1–6.

Frances Marie D. C., Roa-Lingad, Siong R. L. B. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of a Filipino Dry Eye Screening Questionnaire // Philipp. J. Ophthalmol. – 2018. – V. 43. – P. 65–71.

Midorikawa-Inomata A., Inomata T., Nojiri S. et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease // BMJ Open. – 2019. – V. 9, N 11. – P. e033940.

Martinez J. D., Galor A., Amescua G. et al. Transcultural validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire for the Mexican population // Int. Ophthalmol. – 2019. – V. 39. – P. 2313–2324.

Koh S., Chalmers R., Kabata D. et al. Translation and validation of the 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) among Japanese soft contact lens wearers: The J-CLDEQ-8 // Cont. Lens Anterior Eye. – 2019. – V. 42. – P. 533–539.

Gothwal V. K., Pesudovs K., Wright T. A., McMonnies C. W. McMonnies Questionnaire: Enhancing Screening for Dry Eye Syndromes with Rasch Analysis // Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. – 2010. – V. 51, N 3. – P. 1401‒1407.

Caffery B. E., Richter D., Simpson T. et al. CANDEES. The Canadian Dry Eye Epidemiology Study // Advances in experimental medicine and biology. –1998. ‒ V. 438. – P. 805–806.

Pakdel F., Gohari M. R., Jazayeri A. S. et al. Validation of Farsi Translation of the Ocular Surface Disease Index // J. Ophthalmic. Vis. Res. – 2017. – V. 12. – P. 301–304.

Rahman A. A. A., Badarudin N. E., Azemin M. Z. C. et al. Development of a Bahasa Melayu Version of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) // Int. J. Allied Health Sci. – 2017. ‒ V. 1, N 1.

Abetz L., Rajagopalan K., Mertzanis P. et al. Development and validation of the impact of dry eye on everyday life (IDEEL) questionnaire, a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure for the assessment of the burden of dry eye on patients // Health Qual Life Outcomes. – 2011. – V. 9, N 111.

Chalmers R. L., Begley C. G., Caffery B. Validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses // Contact lens & anterior eye: the journal of the British Contact Lens Association. ‒ 2009. – V. 33, N 2. – P. 55–60.

Sakane Y., Yamaguchi M., Yokoi N. et al. Development and validation of the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score questionnaire // JAMA Ophthalmol. – 2013. – V. 131. – P. 1331–1338.

Rubin G., West S., Muñoz B. et al. A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project // Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. – 1997. – V. 38. – P. 557–68.

Pei-Chia Chiang P., Fenwick E., Marella M. et al. Validation and reliability of the VF-14 questionnaire in a German population // Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. – 2011. – V. 52. – P. 8919–8926.

Gillespie B. W., Musch D. C., Niziol L. M. et al. Estimating minimally important differences for two vision-specific quality of life measures // Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. – 2014. – V. 55, N 7. – P. 4206–4212.

Kryvoviaz O. The quality of life of patients as a criterion of efficacy of primary open angle glaucoma therapy // IOSR J. Pharmacy Biol. Sci. – 2016. – V. 11, Iss. 5, Ver. III. – P. 12–14.

Kryvoviaz O. V., Kryvoviaz S. O., Tomashevska Yu. O. Kachestvo zhyzny patsyentov s syndromom sukhoho hlaza: vlyianye sredstv zamestytelnoi terapyy na osnove solei hyaluronovoi kyslotі s dekspantenolom // Oftalmolohyia. Vostochnaia Evropa. – 2021. – Т. 11, Vyp. 3. – S. 417–422.

How to Cite
Tomashevska, Y. O. (2022). Tools for assessing the quality of life of patients with dry eye syndrome. Farmatsevtychnyi Zhurnal, (2), 38-47.
Management of pharmacy